Richard Tarnas in "Cosmos and Psyche" makes the claim below about astrologers having "unanimous consensus" about the meaning of Uranus after its discovery in 1781. It's hard to imagine there was no dissent, especially among astrologers, lol. Can anyone familiar with astro history back that up?

"Since at least the turn of the twentieth century, the unanimous consensus among astrologers is that the planet Uranus is empirically associated with the principle of change, rebellion, freedom, liberation, reform and revolution, and the unexpected breakup of structures; with sudden surprises, revelations and awakenings, lightning-like flashes of insight, the acceleration of thoughts and events; with births and new beginnings of all kinds; and with intellectual brilliance, cultural innovation, technological invention, experiment, creativity, and originality."

submitted by /u/agent_tater_twat
[link] [comments]

from Astrology https://ift.tt/JAdOkU2
via IFTTT

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is the via combusta really Scorpio?

My ascendent is - according to birth certificate time - 27 degrees Libra. But I was just playing around with a rectification app and realized that if I didn't know the exact time, I'd definitely rectify it to 15 minutes later. Because when it has you match Libra vs Scorpio type traits, I come out more definitely Scorpio. Although I have usually been considered "pretty" and have codependent keeping the peace traits, I am much more on the side of "tense", "excessive seriousness", often told I have a hypnotic gaze and voice, obsessed with sex, spirituality, and power, as well as a life story sadly involving poverty, loneliness, extreme situations, persecution by authorities, etc Is this just normal for it being in the Via Combusta? Or maybe the BC is wrong? I also have a placement of Uranus in Scorpio in the 1rst House so maybe that's it, although I thought sign didn't matter so much for outer planets. submitted by /u/pilgrim_dragon_g
Read more