Richard Tarnas in "Cosmos and Psyche" makes the claim below about astrologers having "unanimous consensus" about the meaning of Uranus after its discovery in 1781. It's hard to imagine there was no dissent, especially among astrologers, lol. Can anyone familiar with astro history back that up?
"Since at least the turn of the twentieth century, the unanimous consensus among astrologers is that the planet Uranus is empirically associated with the principle of change, rebellion, freedom, liberation, reform and revolution, and the unexpected breakup of structures; with sudden surprises, revelations and awakenings, lightning-like flashes of insight, the acceleration of thoughts and events; with births and new beginnings of all kinds; and with intellectual brilliance, cultural innovation, technological invention, experiment, creativity, and originality."
[link] [comments]
from Astrology https://ift.tt/JAdOkU2
via IFTTT
Comments
Post a Comment