**EDIT, since I think my question is unclear** I think maybe my question is not being understood. Astrology does predict some character traits, right? Confident, creative, assertive, people pleaser, willful, adventurous, etc etc etc. Right? Now obviously the nature and the universe don't consider traits to be good or bad, but we as people do, right? So, it would be possible for some signs to have more traits we might consider bad than others. Like lazy, greedy, slovenly, meek, manipulative, rash, temperamental, lacking in discipline, easily swayed, etc etc. The stars don't consider those traits bad, the stars don't care. But we do. But every time I look at or read into the signs, there seems to be a very focused effort to portray all of the signs as being equally possessing of traits that we might consider good or bad. Like they'll list 3 strong traits and 3 weak traits of every sign, or list every sign with the same number of good traits as each other, or use ...
